only woman
2007-10-23 16:06:13.0
It does not mean that she was the only woman of her time who was ancestral to modern humans.
In other words, mitochondrial Eve was not a Biblical Eve. However the Biblical Eve, if she
had existed, might well be mitochondrial Eve Mitochondrial Eve The concept of "mitochondrial
Eve" is widely misunderstood. It does not mean that she was the only woman of her time who
was ancestral to modern humans. In other words, mitochondrial Eve was not a Biblical Eve.
However the Biblical Eve, if she had existed, might well be mitochondrial Eve (though not
necessarily: it could be one of her female Eventually the set will contain only one woman,
who is known as "mitochondrial Eve". The mtDNA of all living humans is inherited from
mitochondrial Eve. Normally our mtDNA is identical to that of our mother. But, like all DNA,
mtDNA mutates occasionally so that one of the bases
     changes to a different base. Because of these mutations, human mtDNA has been slowly
diverging from the mtDNA of mitochondrial Eve, and the amount of mutation is roughly
proportional to the amount of time that has passed. This means that similarity of mtDNA for
any two humans provides a rough estimate of how closely they are related through their
maternal ancestors. If they have identical mtDNA, they are fairly closely related, maybe
even siblings. If they have very different mtDNA, it means their last common maternal
ancestor lived long ago. However, using the genetic difference to estimate the time of the
last common ancestor is difficult, for a couple of reasons. One is that the rate at which
mtDNA mutates is poorly measured. The other is that even if the average mutation rate is
accurately known, some lineages will as a matter of chance accumulate fewer or more
mutations than average.
Google

文章评论
[以下网友留言只代表其个人观点,不代表中华网的观点或立场]
发表评论
昵 称:
主 页:
内 容:
表 情: